Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Tuesday, Apr 1, 2003, at 12:29 Australia/Melbourne, Tina Manley wrote: > At 05:53 PM 3/31/2003 -0800, you wrote: >> Yep they were kind enough to replace the first and the second, but >> what's >> the point of having malfunctioning equipment replaced with just >> another >> piece of malfunctioning equipment ? I'm wide open for suggestions as >> you >> may well figure. :-( Or would you really like to hear how I feel? ;-) >> >> ted > > Ted - > > I have the Nikon LS4000 and love it. It has never given me a minute > of trouble. > > Polaroid is bankrupt. Go with Nikon. I have a Polaroid slide maker, which has seen far too little use: in part that's because as soon as I buy anything it goes out of favor (in this case they invented digital projectors and software slide presentations), but in part through poor back up: I could never get good driver updates, and therefore have to keep my old computers running to use it. In the end, I kicked myself for buying Polaroid, not because of the quality of the gear, but because of the size and future of the company. Tina is right: stick with the strength: of course we should all sell our Leicas and defect !!!!! Now if only Epson would produce a driver for the Stylus 700 I could get rid of the third computer on my home office network ;-) Cheers Alastair - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html