Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] manipulated photos
From: "Hagerman, Douglas" <Douglas.Hagerman@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:34:44 -0500

Re manipulated photos, everybody has seen those super-long telephoto pictures accompanying stories like "new airport runway threatens nearby homes," the ones that  make it look like the airplane wheels are brushing the suburban house. So if you select a lens in order to change the emphasis of your photo, is that against the rules? Perhaps photojournalists should only be allowed 35 or 50mm lenses, to eliminate this dimension of distortion!

Realistically, the editor needs to decide what he wants to publish, and then make sure his reporters know the rules. If the reporter breaks the rules then he (or she) is open to termination.

For example, National Geographic didn't seem to have a problem moving pyramids around a few years ago...and whether that was just to make a point or not is irrelevant: The editor gets to decide what he thinks is appropriate.

Doug.






- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html