Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Daniel, I can't see why you feel the development times are too long. The shots appear to have a full range of tones. If you increase development, you will lose out in the highlight department - they look fine to me. Cheers Mark. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Ridings" <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> To: <paw@topica.com>; <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 4:41 PM Subject: [Leica] PAW 14 dlridings > This week's PAW was done with one camera, one lens and one roll of film, > the new Tri-X (400TX). I wanted to run a few rolls of the new Tri-X to get > a feel for it. I've only processed a few rolls, but my first impression is > that the developing times that are recommended are too short for me. Of > course anyone else's mileage will vary. > > It is supposed to have different characteristics when it comes to static > electricity and I'm sure it does. What that _means_, I'm not sure of. I've > battled with dust like never before. But in Kodak's defense it has to be > said that we have had days of storm winds kicking up all the salt and sand > that was used to keep the roads clear over the winter. > > Gunneboslott (Gunnebo Palace) is in a country setting with an English > garden. The alternatives are something of a series, a walk through the grounds. > > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2003/14.html > > All with an M2 and 35mm Summicron. > > Daniel > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html