Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: KL vs PKL
From: "Christopher Williams" <leicachris@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 18:37:07 -0500
References: <062001c30206$00b2c100$056fa8c0@MillStone>

Kodak only makes a limited supply of Pro Kodachrome 200, so the prices are
outrageous. Guess Nat Geo can afford it.

On the topic of Kodachrome, Digital ICE 2 will be able to scan Kodachrome.
Jump up and get down! Jump! Jump!

Chris


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Lew Schwartz"
Subject: [Leica] OT: KL vs PKL


> Just getting back into Kchromes again and I came across the
> price difference between Kodachrome 200's KL around $7.50/roll and PKL
> at $20.00/roll. What on earth makes a 35mm film worth $20.00 a roll?
>
> -Lew S



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Lew Schwartz" <lew@clsystems.com> ([Leica] OT: KL vs PKL)