Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Uncertainty Principle
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 04:20:04 +0200
References: <BAC37B35.A509%caliguri@rcn.com> <3E9E0A3E.FF3C9C78@pacbell.net>

0?
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerry Lehrer" <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 3:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Uncertainty Principle


> Ed
>
> I would say that the question of Schroedingers Cat applies
> more to the problem at hand.  It is easily solve by applying
> the principal of Occams Razor.
>
> Jerry
>
> Edward Caliguri wrote:
>
> > The Uncertainty Principle refers to he fact both the position of an
electron
> > and it's energy at that moment cannot be determined at the same exact
time;
> > perturbation of the system in order to determine one of these as exact
as
> > possible changes the other.
> >     I guess I don't understand the relation to photography in general ..
> >     Ed
> >
> > > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Leica Users digest)
> > > Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
> > > To: leica-users-digest@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > Subject: Leica Users digest V24 #240
> > >
> > > Does the uncertainty principle of Heissenberg not aply to an m?
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Edward Caliguri <caliguri@rcn.com> ([Leica] Uncertainty Principle)
Message from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Uncertainty Principle)