Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is a great paper! Very interesting reading. One phrase is especially interesting: Otherwise, it can happen that good optics with high modulation are judged to be worse than inferior optics with a lower modulation. The quote is about the relationship of a lens with a given resolution and high modulation to the resolution of the final capture medium. If the frequency of the image being resolved onto the medium roughly matches the medium's frequency, and the modulation is high, the lens' performance appears to decrease. (This is due to aliasing behavior.) Film is a little nicer than a digital sensor, in that its structure provides some nice anti-aliasing, but it may have the same artifact if your lens and film combo hit the right sweet spot. Given that the modern Leica optics seem to be designed to increase high-frequency modulation, this may be one reason why users are complaining about the "bokeh" and apparent lower depth of field of what should be Leica's technically best lenses. Increasing the resolution of the film would be one solution. Or smear some vaseline on the lens. George Lottermoser <imagist@concentric.net> said: > For all techies who have found interest in the > optical requirements of digital - Schneider has > a white paper on their thoughts: > > <http://www.schneideroptics.com/info/white_papers/optics_for_digital_photography.pdf> - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html