Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I completely agree with Austin, I completely disagree with Gary, My $.02 worth on this subject, not that anyone cares! Not even me... :-) At 09:54 PM 5/26/2003 +0200, someone wrote: >I've not yet tested this camera >with my R lenses, with an adapter, but it could be the best of two >worlds, specially the 21-35 Vario Elmar truly better than Canon 16-35 L I would like someone to SHOW ME (or anyone) the difference in finished images, between using the 21-35 Vario Elmar and the Canon 16-35 L, on a EOS 1D body. I do not believe that a digital sensor has the ability to collect enough of the right kind of image data that signifies or plays-up the differences between these two lenses. Truly stunning digital images are not the result of a particular lens and sensor, they are the result of in camera and out of camera image processing algorithms. Jim - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html