Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] replace supra with ___?
From: Mike Quinn <mlquinn.mail@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 21:42:59 -0700

Same here.
Reala is the best best substitute for Supra so far, but I'd rate Reala at 64
or 80 rather than 100.
It REALLY doesn't like being underexposed...

I don't think that slide films can be used in place of negatives.
My scanner seems to agree.

Mike Quinn

Mark J. Rosen wrote:

> I've been using kodak supra 100 and 400 for a while now, and I stil have a
> dozen rolls or so of each in the refrigerator.  I've gotten good results
> with Reala, though on overcast days it's not particularly satisfying.  

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html