Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Journalism, altered photo's, and other ethical debates
From: "Don R." <don.ro@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 12:05:19 -0600
References: <953CB5BA-112D-11D8-A920-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>

Were these photos taken with a Leica? With a Leica lens?

This is just another OT post.

Don R.
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Collier" <jbcollier@shaw.ca>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Journalism, altered photo's, and other ethical debates


> Actually it started out in the reverse. All we were discussing was that 
> the mere presence of the photographer has an impact and changes the 
> situation: sometimes significantly. Some felt it was important to 
> realize this while others claimed it was not a factor in their 
> photography. There were no personal insinuations until they were 
> directed at Rob's work.
> 
> John Collier
> 
> On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 01:59 AM, Eric Welch wrote:
> 
> > Exactly! The problem lies in people like Rob and others who say that 
> > the
> > approach advocated by Tina, Me, the NPPA, Ted and others is not a valid
> > approach because we somehow are making this mistake. But the mistake 
> > is that
> > assumption - which is grossly inaccurate.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Journalism, altered photo's, and other ethical debates)