Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The Leica of LF cameras?
From: "Bill Harting" <wharting@adelphia.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:53:16 -0500
References: <BBDEA735.AE9%quincyogwin@bellnet.ca> <636C892D-1948-11D8-B2C0-000393AC0E1A@johnbrownlow.com>

Are you doing any walk-around shooting with the Linhof? 


- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Johnny Deadman" <lists@johnbrownlow.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] The Leica of LF cameras?


> Well, I had a Littman for a while but although it has certain Leica 
> aspects (its unique quality is that it has a rangefinder built into the 
> optical viewfinder) it really isn't the  Leica of 4x5. If a 
> rangefinder-in-viewfinder 4x5 is what you need, then a Littman is the 
> only game in town, but I personally found it to be an awkward kind of 
> combination. When picking up a 4x5 it is very odd not to have any 
> movements, or to be able to change lenses, which really seems like 
> about half the *point* of a 4x5 camera to me. Also the Littman is 
> really quite large. I have big hands but what it would be like for 
> someone with small hands is a bit hard to imagine.
> 
> I just swapped the Littman for a nice Linhof Master Technika which does 
> actually *feel* a lot more like a Leica and has quite a nice 
> rangefinder too.
> 
> On Nov 17, 2003, at 4:26 PM, Quincy Ogwin wrote:
> 
> > On 11/16/03 9:32 PM, "Jeff S" <four_season_photo@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry, no such animal exists! Lots of nicely-crafted
> >> LF cameras out there, but there's always a tradeoff
> >> between features and portability, and to some extent,
> >> speed of set-up, so you'll need to prioritize. All
> >> modern view cameras are "pro" cameras.
> >
> >
> > Really, what about the Littman ? It's about as Leica as it gets for 
> > handheld
> > work. Far more precision than that hobo thingie....
> >
> > Wasn't the question what's the "Leica" of LF cameras ? Then it's the 
> > Littman
> > for sure.
> >
> > -=-
> > Quincy
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> >
> --
> John Brownlow
> 
> http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
> http://www.unintended-consequences.com
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Johnny Deadman <lists@johnbrownlow.com> (Re: [Leica] The Leica of LF cameras?)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] The Leica of LF cameras?)
In reply to: Message from Quincy Ogwin <quincyogwin@bellnet.ca> (Re: [Leica] The Leica of LF cameras?)
Message from Johnny Deadman <lists@johnbrownlow.com> (Re: [Leica] The Leica of LF cameras?)