Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The Right To Privacy
From: Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:17:06 -0800
References: <3.0.2.32.20031116192526.00d69c3c@pop.infionline.net> <3.0.2.32.20031115205739.0100297c@pop.infionline.net> <3.0.2.32.20031116192526.00d69c3c@pop.infionline.net> <3.0.2.32.20031117231223.01002a30@pop.infionline.net>

Agreed, but it all depends on context, the family and how much they may 
trust the photojournalist and how he/she approaches them. Or how pubic 
the funeral/return of caskets is.

Penumbra, that's a great word to use. Thanks.

On Nov 17, 2003, at 8:12 PM, Marc James Small wrote:

> However, I was using the term in its broader meaning, Eric -- would a
> family desire privacy for a funeral of a young member killed 
> unexpectedly?
> And the answer to that, of course, is yes in almost all cases.
"In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, 
'Make us your slaves, but feed us.'" - Dostoevsky

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Marc James Small <msmall@infionline.net> (RE: [Leica] XXX of the YYY? WAS (something else) (fwd))
Message from Marc James Small <msmall@infionline.net> (Re: [Leica] XXX of the YYY? WAS (something else) (fwd))
Message from Marc James Small <msmall@infionline.net> (RE: [Leica] XXX of the YYY? WAS (something else) (fwd))
Message from Marc James Small <msmall@infionline.net> ([Leica] The Right To Privacy)