Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 11/30/03 11:15 PM, "Mark Rabiner" <mark@rabinergroup.com> wrote: > "Finally, here was an opportunity to truly compare the $12,000 16MP > Kodak back with the $29,000 22MP Leaf back." > > Asif the $30,000 price tag for the 0 22MP Leaf back the article is about > is not the first consideration to make this thing a non consideration. > But interesting non the less. > Only months ago a 10K D1s was the cat's ass...just *exactly* what is good enough to take pictures of trees ? Fatso-n-balding-way-past-middle-age men drive 100K Porches for a reason. And it's not because they can afford them. It's because they can afford them that they buy them - there's a big difference. Nothing against digital, either....I like digital, but jesus, in Reichmann's case it's like using a cannon as a fly swatter....or Porches. - -=- Quincy - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html