Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced)
From: "Dean" <dean@tbc.t-com.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:58:36 +0900
References: <200312031633.IAA17183@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>

Hello.

I have never sent a post here, but have been lurking for a while.

Quite a sensitive issue this digital business, it seems. Anyway, my friend,
who is fluent in Japanese, posted this on another list a while back. I
thought I might quote him here, as some might find this interesting.

"There was an interesting artile on this in a recent issue of Asahi Camera.
I think I've mentioned it before. The general judgement was that Leica was
providing quite different image-processing software, and that if you liked
the result (examples shown) it was definitely worth the difference in
price. The pictures did look rather different."

Didn't see the mag myself, and I understand that what is quoted above pretty
much covers everything that was said about the difference (i.e. that's all
there is on this at this time).

Hope this was in some way useful (more virtual wheat to be ground in the
speculation mill?).

Sooner,
Dean Johnston




.


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))