Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] #$@%$^ art photographers
From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:09:42 -0500

LUG:

I can't imagine what the internet is doing.  Sorry for the multiple 
messages, if you got them.  I'm never quite sure what I'm sending and what 
other people are getting.  I can tell you that I have had no Lagavulin 
tonight and I am not wearing a Tilley hat; however, my opinions of art have 
not changed and I still consider Kyle to be a legitimate, not art, 
photographer. (In spite of the link that he sent us to that made me go take 
a bath!)

Tina


At 10:21 AM 12/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>[responding to tina and nathan, whos comments are below]
>
>Well ... I'm nothing if not an art photographer (lord knows I'm not any
>_other_ kind of photographer)

I never thought of you as an art photographer, Kyle.  And that's a 
compliment ;-)
Now if you snipped your photographs into pieces and glued them animal skins 
that you suspend in mid-air and blow with a fan, that would be art photography.

Tina


Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] #$@%$^ art photographers)