Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Digilux 2, again
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 10:31:13 -0800
References: <58A7238E-2D93-11D8-BD3D-0003938C439E@btinternet.com> <BAY10-DAV33jVuMhvqg000099f2@hotmail.com>

eric asked us:
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Digilux 2, again


> The body and lens dimensions look so very M rangefinder.
> So again - Why can't they design a digital M body?
> I know it has been discussed at length about angles of incidence and
sensors
> not up to the task - but what is so different about the digilux 2 that
> precludes designing a body to accept M lenses?<<<

How does this sound for getting an answer to your above quaestion?    Ask
Leica! ;-) Because no one here has any kind of "in-house" Leica answer!


ted



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie@btinternet.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Digilux 2, again)
Message from "eric" <leica_korenman@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Digilux 2, again)