Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] B&W experiment and Noctilux portraits...
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:55:58 -0800
References: <5.2.1.1.2.20031214214818.03ea8be0@192.168.100.11> <3FDDEB3A.323ED478@chello.nl> <3FDDF4E1.6030506@osheaven.net> <005001c3c33a$c2600ce0$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net> <3FDE14E7.8030804@osheaven.net>

Yes of course, sorry. I misunderstood your post.

Sandy & I are sticklers for clean negs whether wet or scanner printing. If
one starts without cleaning their negs as clean as possible all they're
doing is creating a waste of time later spotting for hours in either case.

Although I've found I'd much rather spot via PShop than spit and brush.;-)

It's my understanding Nikon digital ice isn't effective with B&W because the
ice reads the grain as dust or something like that. However, that's by word
of mouth as I've not seen samples.

But digital ice on colour apparently works amazingly well.

ted



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from sam <sam@osheaven.net> ([Leica] Editor and Publisher)
Reply from Seth Rosner <sethrosner@direcway.com> (Re: [Leica] B&W experiment and Noctilux portraits...)
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] B&W experiment and Noctilux portraits...)
In reply to: Message from "Richard F. Man" <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> ([Leica] B&W experiment and Noctilux portraits...)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] B&W experiment and Noctilux portraits...)
Message from sam <sam@osheaven.net> (Re: [Leica] B&W experiment and Noctilux portraits...)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] B&W experiment and Noctilux portraits...)
Message from sam <sam@osheaven.net> (Re: [Leica] B&W experiment and Noctilux portraits...)