Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas
From: Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:23:01 +0100
References: <3FDD4CA5.8F1FB1BA@chello.nl> <187201c3c322$9471b490$0200a8c0@Desk> <3FDDEC35.3D741D7E@chello.nl> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0312160947060.8128@hedvig.uio.no>

This is one of those instances where using a quite saturated film like
the Ektachrome 100G worked quite well.

Nathan

Daniel Ridings wrote:
> 
> > No, the 35 Summilux is not prone to vignetting. I guess it just happened
> > on these shots. The light was in fact awful, a really depressing grey
> > and dark day.
> 
> Boy, you'd never know it! The subtle colors are really attractive.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> >
- -- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
Mobile: +31 630 868 671

Photo site: http://www.wajsmanphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> ([Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas)
Message from robertmeier@usjet.net (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas)
Message from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas)