Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R
From: "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 07:21:04 -0600
References: <200401022159.i02LxHb21510@perch.serverhost.net> <013001c3d17d$e83dfe80$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <014e01c3d180$fc6cbe70$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8>
Animal:
>http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/film.vs.digital.1.html
This guy's site is pretty good. I've been through there before. I love his
large format pics. I can't imagine what they'd look like in person.
Eric
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com> ([Leica] The amazing Leicaflex SL)
In reply to:
Message from "Kit McChesney" <kitmc@acmefoto.com> (RE: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)