Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes..That I was given - Interesting that you didn't put the dimensions in the same order, Steve... Leica/E-1 in MM....135/141 - 82/81 - 103/104.... Yup...The E-1 is all of 6 mm wider...and it's a DSLR...but it's 1 mm 'thiner' front to back and 1 mm taller..... - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Steve Unsworth Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 2:29 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] Digilux 2 vs Panasonic LC From the Leica web site... 135 x 82 x103 mm / approx. 5 5/16 x 3 1/4 x 4 1/16 in As opposed to the Olympus E1 that you were given which is... 141 x 104 x 81 mm (5.6 x 4.1 x 3.2 in) Steve - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of B. D. Colen Sent: 04 January 2004 19:16 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] Digilux 2 vs Panasonic LC Wide angle? What, a 12 mm? It sure doesn't look that wide - and that model must be TINY. What are the dimensions - the height and width in particular? - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html