Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Kodak 400TCN
From: "eric" <leica_korenman@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:50:30 -0500
References: <l03102801bc2b7b084567@[10.1.0.86]>

TCN is my B&W film of choice to scan.
Gorgeous skin tones. Can be shot at 50-800 ASA.
I prefer 320.
http://www.faneuil.net/year%202002/week32.htm

Eric

- --------------------------------------------------
www.faneuil.net

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Lawlor" <wvl@infinex.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 6:10 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Kodak 400TCN


>
>
> I think TCN is not a bad substitute for TriX if printed properly. There is
> a lab near San Francisco that will print it on Agfa b&w silver paper. I
> think the results are much better than prints on color paper. On silver
> paper the full tonal range comes across. They will print matte or glossy
> with borders and full-frame on 4X6 or larger. I shot five rolls at a
> friend's wedding last summer and the couple was very happy. It makes me
> want to fill the trays and go into the dark again.
> Bill Lawlor
> .................................
>
> "I have settled on T400CN because my local processor prints the 6x4's on
Agfa
> colour paper and it prints almost true b&w. It also scans as b&w, unlike
the
> Portra which comes out blue.
>
> I never print any images I just post to the web so I have no experience of
> how it will look when enlarged. How much do I like Kodak T400CN? I just
> bought 40 rolls of it.
>
> Sorry again for the confusion and thanks for looking.
>
>
> Graham
> "
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Bill Lawlor <wvl@infinex.com> ([Leica] Re: Kodak 400TCN)