Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I find that the chromogenics have excellent latitude. I think you could shoot a roll at 800 and have a roll of negs that would scan very well. With XP2, I have had a few blown highlights when exposing at the nominal 400. Had they been shot at 800, I'll bet it would have allowed me to at least burn those areas in. At 05:32 PM 1/15/2004, you wrote: >thanks Seth, but however...is it not an option to tell them to push, >or not...not wise, or not an option...? Steve > >| Hi Steve: >| >| Remember that T400CN is color negative technology; it is processed >| automatically by your corner Ritz shop in C41 chemistry. Nichts? >| >| Seth LaK 9 >| >| > a very lovely image Eric. please tell me... do you always develop >as >| > if it was shot at 400....? Can you shoot at 800 and develop at >400 >| > with good results? >| > >| > thanks, Steve >| > >| > >| > | TCN is my B&W film of choice to scan. >| > | Gorgeous skin tones. Can be shot at 50-800 ASA. >| > | I prefer 320. >| > | http://www.faneuil.net/year%202002/week32.htm >| > | >| > | Eric > > > >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.560 / Virus Database: 352 - Release Date: 1/8/04 > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html