Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 1/19/04 7:56 PM, "Bill Lawlor" <wvl@infinex.com> wrote: > ""It's not true" that > it's illegal to photograph federal buildings, he said this week. "They > misspoke. It's certainly not illegal. But when we see people in front of > buildings taking photos we try to be as vigilant as we can."" > > - -- > The last time I was bothered for taking a photo in public the subject was a > pay phone. (Threat against the communications system?) > > First we learn a photographer can be arrested for photographing patrons at a > shopping mall. Now we are supposed to be afraid to photograph the buildings > we taxpayers paid for? With apologies to Mark R., what's secret about > Portland? > > Next thing you know, they will arrest people of Arabic ancestry and hold > them in secret. No, this is the Land of the Free, it will never happen > here... > > Covertly, Bill Lawlor > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html Did I say there was something secret about Portland? I wonder what I had in mind? Secret shopping malls? Privately owned is all. By the way if we are holding Arabs in secret how come we know about it? I assume you mean the ones we've got in Guantánamo but I don't know. Mark Rabiner - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html