Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Eric, Is the fact that his exposures were uneven with an 28 Elmarit untrue? It seems to me he has film to show there were problems and that should be sufficient evidence. While all three cameras may use the same sensor, there will be implementation/software differences. Certainly none of the cameras were design to be used with an adapter and R lenses. The different feature sets and software of the three cameras may well produce different results with this unintended use. John Collier On Jan 25, 2004, at 4:49 PM, Eric Welch wrote: > Not true. The D300 doesn't have all the spot reading and matrix > reading (it does cost a lot less after all) but it can get every bit > as accurate exposures as the others by anyone who is competent with > manual metering. > > On Jan 25, 2004, at 2:48 PM, Howard Cummer wrote: > >> I have used a 28 Elmarit on a Canon 300D and the exposure was uneven >> so I think that you may need more input from other users as to >> whether the 300D is absolutely suitable. For the Canon D60 and 10D >> the exposure variability does not exist as the cameras can be set >> manually while on the 300D mores settings are automatically >> controlled by the camera. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html