Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] TriX at 800
From: Luc Bourgeois <luc@forcemajeure.qc.ca>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:43:12 -0500

Indeed B.D.,

I've recently done some of my Tri-X at 800 in Xtol 1:1, 70F, 14  
minutes.  Gives a nice little punch, but not too harsh at all. I really  
liked it.

Luc

On Lundi, janvier 26, 2004, at 04:56  PM, B. D. Colen wrote:

> P.S. I would definitely recommend using Xtol now...I've had mine
> processed in Acufine and Xtol, and the Xtol is much smoother...if  
> you're
> looking for that 60's look, then go with Acufine - but if you're  
> looking
> for better results, try the Xtol....
>
> B. D.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of
> marko1976@excite.com
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 4:10 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us;  
> leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] TriX at 800
>
>
>
> I'd say your results at 800 are pretty much on. I'd check out some of
> Jim Marshall's(The Godfather of Rock & Roll Photography) work he shot
> everything with Tri-X @ 800 in D-76.
>
> --- On Mon 01/26, Adam Bridge < abridge@mac.com > wrote:
> From: Adam Bridge [mailto: abridge@mac.com]
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:36:08 -0800
> Subject: [Leica] TriX at 800
>
> I did some playing with Tri-X at 800 and 1600.<br><br>What I don't know
> is how my results should look.<br><br>Here's Wedgewood cup and saucer
> (Wildstrawberry) that was sitting on the island<br>while my wife's book
> discussion group was going on. Illuminted by multiple<br>halogen lights
> above the
> island.<br><br>&lt;www.splitsecondfilms.com/test/TriX800-02-Davis-crp- 
> sp
> t.jpg&gt;<br><br><br>Below is just a detail at full resolution of the
> above since I figure that's the<br>only way to judge. This is a big
> file: 350KB so be
> warned.<br><br>&lt;www.splitsecondfilms.com/test/TriX800-02-Davis-crp- 
> sp
> t-100-detail.jpg&gt;<br><br><br>I'd value knowing - am I getting what I
> should be from Tri-X at 800?<br><br><br><br>I then shot a roll at 1600
> and these plastic dolphins were at hand, the cup<br>having been used
> (the
> nerve!):<br><br><br>&lt;www.splitsecondfilms.com/test/TriX1600-10- 
> Davis_
> 1.jpg&gt;<br><br><br>Here's a full-size
> detail:<br><br>&lt;www.splitsecondfilms.com/test/TriX1600-10-Davis!
> _1-detail.jpg&gt;<br><br><br><br>these were all shot with an R8, 100mm
> APO.<br><br>I did the processing in XTOL 1:1 at 75F by hand, agitating
> for the first minutes<br>and then 10 secs out of ever following minute.
> 8 minutes for the 800 and 9<br>minutes for the 1600.<br><br><br>Thank
> you for any insights you can give!<br><br>Adam<br>--<br>To unsubscribe,
> see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html<br>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
> The most personalized portal on the Web!
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html