Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on a related issue...for shooting... in available darkness, how about Tri X 3200 shot at 1600 and processed normal...I have been told this works great... very fast, with good results... anybody know?.....good way to get you to 1600 ?...Steve >Very true. > >======================================= >I have heard that chromogenic films like XP2 is captured better by >scanners >compared to silver based films. Don't know how true this is. > >Dan K. > >At 04:50 AM 1/27/04, you wrote: >>What are you scanning with? My Minolta Scan Dual II chokes on Tri-X and > >>spews out blotchy scans. Some weird reaction of the scanner res and the > >>grain pattern in Tri-X. Everything else scans fine. Too bad Tri-X is my > >>B&W film of choice! >> >>John Collier >> >>On Jan 26, 2004, at 12:36 PM, Adam Bridge wrote: >> >>>I did some playing with Tri-X at 800 and 1600. >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > > > > > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html