Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Report on Walgreen's Fuji Digital Printer
From: David Degner <david.degner@wku.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:15:40 -0600
References: <B739C1E9-5088-11D8-A8C7-003065D6E648@umich.edu>

I used the Walgreen printer thing this morning as well.  They crop off 
parts of your image file.  I put in a white and black border with 
photoshop on 16 photos and none of them showed it.

David Degner

Dante Stella wrote:

> Ok... here's the dirt on the 20 cent Walgreen's reprints.  I did 243 
> of them over two days (someone actually walked in and did 350 today, 
> they told me).
>
> Their machine takes CD, SD/xD, CF, and Smartmedia.  I would strongly 
> suggest making a CD of only files you want to print and selecting the 
> print-all function, because the preview software is a real pain in the 
> arse.  As in manually scrolling, one frame at a time, through the CD 
> from end to end.  The simplest thing to do is to weed first and "print 
> all once."
>
> Printing is 300 dpi for 4x6 and 6x8 (don't quote me, but I saw the 
> manual and it said 1205x1595 for 4x6 prints).  The Fuji printing unit 
> uses a UV-fixed thermal color printer (that was in the book too).  
> Absolutely no idea how that works, but it doesn't involve ink.
>
> In black and white, the prints are good - much better in tonality and 
> sharpness than getting your 135 negs printed on an RA-4 minilab using 
> that chromogenic black and white paper.  Prints have something of a 
> brownish sepia tone and look like they are doing at least 32 different 
> shades of grey, more than I can say for the RA-4 paper.
>
> No idea what the archival life is - I am using them to make proofs 
> from hundreds of scanned 6x4.5 negs - and I could care less.
>
> Problems - occasional streaking (cold heads?); grainy blown out skies 
> can look pretty bad.
>
> Holds detail well in highlights and shadows.  Definitely not FB paper, 
> but for 20 cents and no mess... well, you can live with it.
>
> Print time is about 60 seconds for the first; 10 seconds for each 
> additional.
>
> Frontier seems to be a little better, but around here, it's six times 
> the cost per reprint.  And there are no Frontier machines available at 
> 11pm.
> ____________
> Dante Stella
> http://www.dantestella.com
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Christopher Williams" <leicachris@worldnet.att.net> (Re: [Leica] Report on Walgreen's Fuji Digital Printer)
In reply to: Message from Dante Stella <dante@umich.edu> ([Leica] Report on Walgreen's Fuji Digital Printer)