Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] TMax ! 3200 at 1600/was TriX at 800
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:52:20 +0100 (MET)
References: <003b01c3e46b$75cd5390$6401a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E> <4015B39F.1060205@cox.net>

I use Delta 3200 in MF under the same period I use Neopan 1600 for 35mm.
My "RAW" (Rollei a week :) ) for week 2 is Delta 3200 rated at 1600 and
processed according to the box in Ilford DD-X:

http://www.dlridings.com/paw2004/2alt1.html

I think it is a very nice film. I haven't tried Tmax 3200. No real reason,
other than I have no complaints against Delta 3200 @ EI 1600.

Daniel


On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Steve Barbour wrote:

> errrrr.....TMax 3200 or Delta 3200  shot  at 1600....
> thanks, Steve
>
> B. D. Colen wrote:
> > Don't you mean Ilford Delta 3200? There's Tri-X is a 400 - or 320 - asa
> > film.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Steve
> > Barbour
> > Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 7:02 PM
> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > Subject: RE: [Leica] TriX 3200 at 1600/was TriX at 800
> >
> >
> > on a related issue...for shooting... in available darkness,  how
> > about Tri X 3200 shot at 1600 and processed normal...I have been told
> > this works great...  very fast, with good results... anybody
> > know?.....good way to get you to 1600 ?...Steve
> >
> >
> >
> >>Very true.
> >>
> >>=======================================
> >>I have heard that chromogenic films like XP2 is captured better by
> >>scanners compared to silver based films.  Don't know how true this is.
> >>
> >>Dan K.
> >>
> >>At 04:50 AM 1/27/04, you wrote:
> >>
> >>>What are you scanning with? My Minolta Scan Dual II chokes on Tri-X
> >>>and
> >>
> >>>spews out blotchy scans. Some weird reaction of the scanner res and
> >>>the
> >>
> >>>grain pattern in Tri-X. Everything else scans fine. Too bad Tri-X is
> >>>my
> >>
> >>>B&W film of choice!
> >>>
> >>>John Collier
> >>>
> >>>On Jan 26, 2004, at 12:36 PM, Adam Bridge wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I did some playing with Tri-X at 800 and 1600.
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>To unsubscribe, see
> >>>http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] TriX 3200 at 1600/was TriX at 800)
Message from Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> ([Leica] TMax ! 3200 at 1600/was TriX at 800)