Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] digital in low light
From: John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 20:09:37 -0700
References: <152.29b08df6.2d4d03bc@aol.com> <00cd01c3e84d$f159b5e0$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <401C561E.4020704@wanadoo.nl>

Then all the pros (and Kodak) must be dumping their medium format gear 
for another reason which just doesn't seem to spring to mind. All that 
matters are the results honey. You can go on and on about whatever you 
want but the results speak for themselves. People aren't switching to 
digital because it's popular you know...

John Collier

A, thus far, die hard film user -- who would switch if they could make 
a digital with an M viewfinder and a film recorder that could print 
chromes to match.

On Jan 31, 2004, at 6:27 PM, Michiel Fokkema wrote:

> Erwin Puts explains that no digicam is even close to slow film.

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Reply from Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
In reply to: Message from Teresa299@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Fw: [Large Format] Beth Keiser Shoots B&W 4x5 ForCampaign Coverage)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> ([Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Michiel Fokkema <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)