Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Frank Dernie wrote: > Sorry I don't have a web site so you will have to take my word for the > fact that in my case with a DSLR I get better results than I ever have > on film in poor light. Digital P&S is much worse than film IME. > Frank thanks Frank... especially in this case, a picture is worth a thousand words.... on the computer screen, but of course better than that, will be the enlarged prints, to finally convince people........Steve > > > On Monday, February 2, 2004, at 08:06 pm, Steve Barbour wrote: > >> animal wrote: >> >>>>>> Do any of you know of a link or publication that explains at >>>>>> what iso >>> >>> the >>> >>>>>> crossover is to 35mm,s film better performance. >>>>>> A friend of mine who does pro sport showed me some low light >>>>>> stuff made >>>>>> with his top Canon and it was allmost scary. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> let's see the photos...steve >>> >>> I,ll ask him if I can do that. >>> simon >> >> >> Hi Simon, we have been hearing how digital is better in low light >> than film...I think we all would like to see the photos and the >> objective testing that supports this conclusion... >> >> Steve >> -- >> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html