Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] PayPal rant
From: sam <sam@osheaven.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 23:18:29 -0500
References: <jhnt10pseeicoipef8sg6gja381dgugmfa@4ax.com> <3.0.6.32.20040202173707.007c6ca0@mail.mcn.org> <FFFC6217-55F6-11D8-99BE-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>

You're absolutely right; the refund should have come directly from 
Paypal not the card company.

Sam S


John Collier wrote:

> Did you contact Paypal first? Did you use ebay's mediation first? If 
> somebody reversed a charge on me with no explanation, warning or 
> reasoning, I would treat them as suspicious too. Nothing personal as 
> perhaps you did all the above...
> 
> John Collier
> 
> On Feb 2, 2004, at 6:37 PM, Richard Comen wrote:
> 
>> I just bought something on ebay that I paid for via PayPal. I never
>> received the item so I had my bank reverse the payment. PayPal froze my
>> account and the burden of proof was on me to prove my "actions" were not
>> suspicious. I do not need pals like paypal!
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] PayPal rant)
Message from Richard Comen <rpcomen@mcn.org> (RE: [Leica] PayPal rant)
Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] PayPal rant)