Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>From: Jeff S <four_season_photo@yahoo.com> >Subject: Re: [Leica] A new definition of inexpensive camera > >By your cost breakdown, I guess you're just passing >the camera around and letting everyone view the pics >off the little LCD screen. But I can even the score in >film's favor if I just stick to passing around sheets >of my negatives! And figuring that many Leica cameras >are still in use 10+ years later, I think it's fair to >expect that you'll be still using that Rebel in 2014, >right? Not the little lcd on the camera, the big LCD on your desk. I either use the web for distribution, (I'm sure you've seen some of my pictures but never the back of my camera www.kylecassidy.com if you havent), or give the client a CD. They can print what they want. I've not done work for a magazine or newspaper in ... at least three years ... that wanted me to fedex them prints rather than FTP them files. The Internet, I think it's safe to say, is the new paradigm for image delivery. The price of printing is now born mostly by the end user. If I buy a new digital rebel every year and throw the old one in the garbage, I'm still saving $2,500. which is enough to buy an M to put on my shelf and admire. kc - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html