Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you for inviting amateur comments on selections, Tina. I'm in awe of your work, so I don't know how objective I can be -- if I were the editor, I'd keep all. Two images effectively show only the backs of the women: Leonissa and Paulina. Leonissa is well engaged by the dog and nicely framed and front-lighted by the open door. Paulina is not so well engaged by the cat - -- does a cat ever engage well? Given their similar structure, if one has to go, I'd drop Paulina and the cat. In the Rehabilitation photo, I find the boy's arm distracting. I otherwise love the woman's expression. It's the composition that bothers me. It may just be that your composition is too sophisticated for me. There are some fine wines I don't like. Keep that in mind as I "x" Rehabilitation. The Dr. Bobby images are wonderful and different. The significant variations minimize any sense of redundancy. They are different enough that I'd keep all! "Wide Open" must be kept. The empathic responses of the lookers-on create a special moment in time with intense human feeling. Faviana is a beautiful portrait, but an almost cliche pose with a common Nat. Geo. look. If a portrait has to go, perhaps that's it. Your Maria and Julian children's portraits are side by side. If one must go, I'd eliminate Julian. They both engage by eyes and mind, but Maria engages my heart. I have no more time right now. These are my first reactions. If this has been at all helpful, I'll try again. Thank you for allowing a participation in your beautiful art. If only life were always participation in art. Tom Pastorello __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html