Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital M - was Leica to Restructure
From: "Ed Kowaleski" <ekowaleski@twmi.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 20:59:39 -0500
References: <20040207204103.JGJT24575.lakemtao06.cox.net@smtp.central.cox.net> <402582D3.5AEA1B94@pacbell.net> <05c601c3eddc$25b8c540$6501a8c0@lan.artvader.com>
 
I cannot help but recall Stefans Daniels at the St.Louis LHSA meeting last
fall vigorously denying the possibility of a Digital Camera employing "M"
lenses.  Amazing what market pressure can bring about.

Ed K


- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jon" <jon.stanton@comcast.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital M - was Leica to Restructure


> " No, thanks.  I will wait till the bugs are worked out before I buy.
>
> Trying to be the "first kid on the block to own one" was never my way.  I
> left it for the rich kids, then I bought it from them."
>
> Wonderful philosophy!
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from rclompus@cox.net ([Leica] Digital M - was Leica to Restructure)
Message from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Digital M - was Leica to Restructure)
Message from "Jon" <jon.stanton@comcast.net> (Re: [Leica] Digital M - was Leica to Restructure)