Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Adam's 2004 PAW
From: "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:12:00 -0500

Steve,
I don't think the sexes of the subjects is important if you are trying
to hold both individuals eyes in focus.  However, if the individuals are
the same sex then differential focus can imply radically different
things depending on who is in focus.

Don
dorysrus@mindspring.com

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Steve
Barbour
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 8:46 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: [Leica] Adam's 2004 PAW

Adam,
> For your failure:
> http://www.splitsecondfilms.com/2004-MandM/NeoP1600-10-R7-failure.jpg
> 
> did you try reversing the pose so that the man was on the window side
> still behind the woman allowing you to rotate the couple a little more
> into the light?  Also, tipping the woman and man together instead of
the
> woman's head tilting away from the man.  Last, focus on the woman's
eyes
> instead of the man's behind.  Last to your specific point, if you had
a
> tripod then you could have dropped down an aperture or so and held
both
> in focus.
> 
> The images obviously were an effective session for you.  Good
work...Don


Nice images but...  I read that as a woman and a woman....or doesn't it 
matter...?  Steve
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] Adam's 2004 PAW)