Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Adam's 2004 PAW
From: Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:16:07 -0700
References: <r02010100-1032-875EA3DE610F11D8B460000A95C4E7A0@[10.0.1.2]>

what I find interesting Adam, is that if you see/perceive the left 
figure as a man or as a woman, the entire picture is seen totally 
differently, and the age differences are interpreted quite differently 
as well....
Steve


Adam Bridge wrote:
>>Nice images but...  I read that as a woman and a woman....or doesn't it
>>matter...?  Steve
>>
> 
> 
> It was a mother/daughter shoot. But the angle for the mom in the upper left was
> unbecoming (a part of the failure, I need to SEE what the light is doing to
> facial shapes - sometimes I just don't THINK enough).
> 
> So you're right but for the purposes of discussion I wasn't too picky and the
> people I was photographing aren't likely to be reading this list.
> 
> Thank you for your comments which I appreciate.
> 
> Adam
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] Adam's 2004 PAW)