Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Whiston Northamptonshire
From: "Graham Battison" <graham@geebeephoto.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:00:57 -0000
References: <r02010100-1032-E5149E2B63CE11D8A50F000393D465D8@[10.0.1.8]> <40365060.8000103@cox.net> <000c01c3f7e6$2a5ecae0$9caf4d51@desktop> <403684C7.4020609@cox.net>

From: "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: 20 February 2004 22:05
Subject: Re: [Leica] Whiston Northamptonshire


> so do you find that one camera/lens seems
> especially better for certain particular
> qualities...I have not expressly looked for any
> pattern but have not noticed a particular
> difference...Steve
>
> http://www.geebeephoto.com/temp/Whiston.html

- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve,

No pattern, no preference. If I see something I like I will throw all my
gear at it :-)

35mm:
http://www.geebeephoto.com/temp/Easton_Maudit5.html

50mm:
http://www.geebeephoto.com/temp/Easton_Maudit3.html

90mm:
http://www.geebeephoto.com/temp/Easton_Maudit4.html

Leica or Olympus I carry 2 bodies and sometimes repeat the process in
colour. Then I go insane trying to sort out the best one :-)

gb


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Graham Battison" <graham@geebeephoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Whiston Northamptonshire)
Reply from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Whiston Northamptonshire)
In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] Whiston Northamptonshire)
Message from Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] Whiston Northamptonshire)
Message from "Graham Battison" <graham@geebeephoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Whiston Northamptonshire)
Message from Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] Whiston Northamptonshire)