Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT...But camera related..
From: Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 07:44:09 -0500
References: <001c01c3f7d3$56555960$9caf4d51@desktop> <012a01c3f7da$1a17e290$6501a8c0@lan.artvader.com> <40365D37.3000404@hemenway.com> <007d01c3f7fe$3a6f1c60$6501a8c0@lan.artvader.com>

Hi Jon:

Where are you located? Those prices are on the high end. Lately I've 
seen rates in the Boston area from $750 to $3,000 and up.  The low gets 
you a CF card's worth of printable images on a CD. $1,000 gets you a lot 
more shots and some small prints. The higher prices get you a lot of 
proofs and later two small, and one large album. I know of one photog 
who supplies about a thousand proofs on a DVD, (I'm not kidding) in 
their $3,000 package.

And, as you indicated, wedding photographers are getting booked up 
pretty quickly for spring weddings. I don't know if I have a solution 
for you and time is getting short.

You might approach one of the wedding photographers you have already 
contacted to see if they would consider shooting the wedding with a 
digital camera supplied by you... or, get that step father to do it!

To me, the worst part of doing weddings is the printing... every wedding 
with prints/albums is a 40+ hour proposition.  So, a pro might be 
interested in doing nothing more than shooting yours, because it would 
be quick money

Depending on your location, you could rent a D1X for a day, (about 
$100.00 here) and have the "pro/step dad" shoot the pictures, then you 
could take care of the printing yourself.

I think that your disposable idea will generate very few good pictures, 
most with red eye and "flashed out" faces, and any shots of the bride 
will feature a washed out wedding gown with no texture.  My sister put a 
disposable on every table at her son's wedding and was very disappointed 
with the results. In the end she was very happy that the bride's family 
had hired a wedding pro.

What you want is someone with the experience and "eye" to get good 
wedding photos, and a camera that's up to the task.

Jim - http://www.hemenway.com


Jon wrote:
> "I predict that some day in the future, your daughter will regret not having
> had a competent wedding photographer do the job."
> 
> 
> Jim,  Thanks for the feedback...we (parents) are still weighing the options.
> Keep in mind though our daughter truly wants everything as simple as can be.
> I've tested the waters for a working wedding photographer and found the
> going rate is between $3500 & $5000! And that's if I can find one for 5/22.
> My ex wife has a piano student that is a videographer and has offered a
> "deal" to video the wedding for $1500. I will bring my camera of course as
> will my daughters step father (a former wedding photographer) I won't even
> venture into the music, reception dinner or wedding cake....Jon
> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Graham Battison" <graham@geebeephoto.com> ([Leica] Whiston Northamptonshire)
Message from "Jon" <jon.stanton@comcast.net> ([Leica] OT...But camera related..)
Message from Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] OT...But camera related..)
Message from "Jon" <jon.stanton@comcast.net> (Re: [Leica] OT...But camera related..)