Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 36: Hilversum/Amsterdam
From: rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Sun Sep 5 23:17:51 2004
References: <413B4C8A.1050200@planet.nl> <6.1.2.0.2.20040905211045.02124e30@mail.screengang.com> <413BDF9D.3070803@planet.nl> <2568ED12-FFBB-11D8-8D6C-000D93C5BFB2@singnet.com.sg>

Hi Boon Hwee, Nathan
I( agree with you about the leica's 1/1000 limitation. Thats why I use 
mostly Ilford PAN-F 50 ASA with my Summilux.
Didier


>Hi
>
>i would like to chime in and agree with Nathan. One of the "problems" with 
>Leica M gear is the fact that often in the day, outdoors, i am unable to 
>shoot with anything less than f5.6 in the part of the world where i live 
>(near the equator). Esp with Tri-X rated at 400 :) There would have been 
>no bokeh to speak of, esp with my wides!
>
>Conversely, the Canon digital would be able to pull off a f1.4, 1/4000, 
>with variable ISO according to time of day and position of the sun :)
>
>nicely spotted Nathan! i once saw a monkey perched on top of a cyclist in 
>Beijing, but my M was in the bag! argh :P
>
>Boon Hwee
>
>On 06-Sep-04, at AM 11:55, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
>>Hi Didier,
>>
>>No doubt you are right. However, I have to say that in this particular 
>>situation--walking around and snapping quick pictures in bright 
>>sunshine--I doubt that I would have had my Summilux wide open. More 
>>likely at f4 or f5.6, similar to the Sigma, especially since the maximum 
>>shutter speed of the M6 is only 1/1000. But the bokeh would still have 
>>been better. I have since bought a couple of fast Canon lenses--1.4/50mm, 
>>1.8/85mm--which do have quite nice bokeh too, but again, in the situation 
>>at hand, I probably would have had the aperture set to something smaller 
>>than wide open.
>>
>>Nathan
>>
>>Didier Ludwig wrote:
>>>Nathan,
>>>I like the first one most
>>>>http://www.nathanfoto.com/paw/2004/2004_36.jpg
>>>But I can't abstain from the comment that with a open Summi or Nocti, 
>>>you'd have had more and nicer Bokeh than with your Sigma ... :~D
>>>Didier
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>--
>>Nathan Wajsman
>>Almere, The Netherlands
>>
>>General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
>>Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



In reply to: Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan's PAW 36: Hilversum/Amsterdam)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Nathan's PAW 36: Hilversum/Amsterdam)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan's PAW 36: Hilversum/Amsterdam)
Message from reddawn at singnet.com.sg (David Teo Boon Hwee) ([Leica] Nathan's PAW 36: Hilversum/Amsterdam)