Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200
From: nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Tue Sep 7 21:11:11 2004
References: <BD624BDB.5A91%mark@rabinergroup.com> <1094578985.4848.149.camel@failsafe> <413E04DF.6070402@planet.nl> <1eisj09ulgr5bjrnqg9087t00021p11d1q@4ax.com>
 
Eric,

No real difference. The Fuji Neopan developer is what my lab uses, so 
all the B&W I have shot since moving to the Netherlands last year has 
been processed in it (because at the moment I do not have a good space 
to put the Jobo). Gives surprisingly good results, whether it is Fuji 
Acros, Tri-X or Neopan 1600.

For own use, I would still prefer XTOL.

Nathan

Eric wrote:

> 
> What's the main difference you've seen between Neopan in Xtol and in the
> Fuji developer?
> 
> --
> Eric
> http://canid.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] INCORRECTLY R.I.P. ILFORD)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)
Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Re: I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)