Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's simply a good film (too). I just bought 100 rolls of it for medium format. Love the stuff. The latest, from two days ago: http://www.rollei-gallery.net/ridings/image-73798.html A quick'n'dirty shot and scan to atone my sins on the RUG (and start up a controversy about the Xenar ... but we're all tuckered out). But in Sweden it's not cheaper than Tri-X. Not that that matters. The thing keeping me away from it in 35mm is that I can't always find it. It makes me nervous to not be able to find a film. Daniel On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote: > I wouldn't call Neopan Tri-X on the cheap. > It's my considered opinion, from experience, that Neopan is the best suited > BW emulsion for Leica optics. > S.Dimitrov > > > > From: "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> > > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > > Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:24:41 -0500 > > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > Subject: [Leica] Re: Tri-X on the cheap > > > > Feli: > > > >> After taking a look at my bank account, > >> Neopan 400 is looking better by the minute. > > > > There are lots of Neopan fans on this list, I believe. I'm one of them. > > Most of what I shoot these days is Neopan 400 souped in Xtol 1:3. > > > > > > -- > > Eric > > http://canid.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >