Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]As you mentioned earlier i think ,nothing is known about the real performance of the new system. Isn,t it a bit premature to anounce a winner before a match? best regards simon jessurun amsterdam ----- Original Message ----- From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:53 PM Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: New Zeiss Ikon > IF that's Leica's response to an entire line of new Zeiss t-star lenses, > a film rangefinder body, and what will undoubtedly be a digital body, > then we most assuredly have the answer to the question. Because if Leica > survives as the Hermes of cameraland, it might as well not survive. > > And there's another point to think about here, folks - Leica is still > around today for only one reason: > > In the early 1960s, Zeiss/Contax and Nikon abandoned the pro-rangefinder > playing field. Nikon, which made what was definitely the best body at > that time - the SP - decided to put all its eggs in the SLR basket, a > decision which was a loss for those of us who love rangefinders, but was > obviously a winner for Nikon. And Contax must have decided that there > wasn't going to be enough rangefinder business to keep them going. > > So that left the barren playing field to Leica, which, other than > improving it's lens line, hasn't done anything truly innovative since > bringing out and abandoning the M5. And, when you think about it, really > hasn't done anything innovative since the "O." > > But because there have been enough photographers committed to using > rangefinders, and enough dilitants committed to owning Leicas - and a > scarf company willing to buy up a grand old brand name - Leica's limped > along to the present day. > > Now, however, we are on the downward slope of the technology range > taking us into the next age of photography. Any company that wants to > survive in the new age is going to have to be a real part of that age. > And up to this point, Leica has, as usual, limped along at the back end > of the parade. > > So this time Zeiss - well the Zeiss/Kyocera/Hassleblad/Contax coalition > - has decided to stick around and pickup the pieces. Unless Leica is > prepared to move, and move very quickly - perhaps by talking Nikon, > Canon, or Olympus into a rangefinder partnership, Leica's days are, > sadly, very much numbered. I say "sadly" with total sincerity, because I > am enough of a traditionalist to be touched by the Leica heritage - I'd > rather be shooting in a new age with a grandchild of HCB's M3s, than > shooting with a Kocerstein's monster patched together with parts from a > washing machine, a high-milage care, and a disposable camera. :-) > > B. D. > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Dan C > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 4:33 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: New Zeiss Ikon > > > Leica has responded in part by offering the a la carte Leica. But have > you > seen the prices? Do I really want to spend upwards of $4,000 USD for > the > privilege of picking the colour of my camera? Are there enough people > out there willing to do so to keep Leica afloat? > > -dan c. > > At 04:26 PM 29-09-04 -0400, B. D. Colen wrote: > >Emanuel says.. > >"The old era of Zeiss - Leitz rivalry was a heady time > >for 35mm design," and asks... > > > >"Now, in these days, how will Leica respond?" > > > >--- > >As they, sadly, always have ... With too little, too late, and at too > >high a price. > > > >These are not the heady days of the Zeiss/Leitz competition - which, if > > >we recall, were actually the days of the Zeiss/Leitz/Nikon competition. > >;-) > > > >These are the days of the Zeiss/Kyocera/Cosina/Hassie consortium moving > > >in to clean up the remaining scraps from the rangefinder table - scraps > > >that could have been Leicas had Leica moved 18 months ago, or even > >further back, when the Cosina handwriting was writ large upon the wall. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information