Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]...you, see its this qualifier "for its price" that bothers me :^) I'm not looking for the new ASPH quality but if its as good as the old Leica 21's then I'm fine with that. Damn Carl Zeiss for waiting until the spring to release his lenses :^) Greg Locke St. John's, Newfoundland http://blog.greglocke.com ----------------------------- Independent journalism from Newfoundland & Labrador > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+locke=straylight.ca@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+locke=straylight.ca@leica-users.org] On > Behalf Of GREG LORENZO > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 12:56 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] WTB: 21 f3.4 > > Greg Locke writes in part: > > > > > ...and is the C/V 21 f4 REALLY as good as the SA3.4? > > > > I own and use the CV 21/f4 and it is an excellent lens for it's price. > > Regards, > > Greg > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >