Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Zeiss Ikon
From: bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C)
Date: Sun Oct 3 02:26:31 2004
References: <3.0.6.32.20041002174256.00889b30@pop.mail.yahoo.ca> <6.1.2.0.2.20041002231328.02149ec0@mail.screengang.com> <3.0.6.32.20041002170231.007fcab0@pop.mail.yahoo.ca> <7744b3a7744ce7.7744ce77744b3a@shaw.ca> <7744b3a7744ce7.7744ce77744b3a@shaw.ca> <3.0.6.32.20041002170231.007fcab0@pop.mail.yahoo.ca> <3.0.6.32.20041002171126.00884b80@pop.mail.yahoo.ca> <6.1.2.0.2.20041002231328.02149ec0@mail.screengang.com> <3.0.6.32.20041002174256.00889b30@pop.mail.yahoo.ca>

I know, that is why, like you I put quotes around the word "rare".

-dan c.

At 07:24 AM 03-10-04 +0200, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>Hi Dan,
>
>My comment about the rarity was a bit tongue-in-cheek. I do not actually 
>give a hoot whether 3100 or 310000 of these were produced. I just happen 
>to have one, and I like the 0.85 viewfinder, so that is the one I kept.
>
>I do not think it is nearly rare enough to have any collector value.
>
>Nathan
>
>Dan C wrote:
>
>> Nathan....I also have one of those "rare" non-TTL bodies.  I stopped using
>> it and reverted back to my older .72 model, hoping that maybe I could make
>> a killing on eBay.   But last week one in perfect condition sold for only
>> $1200; so much for my dream.   But this is what prompted me to start this
>> thread.
>> 
>> My local dealer here in Montreal told me that he can't get $1500 CDN for a
>> used regular M6.  But unless that Zeiss Ikon turns out to be some kind of
>> miracle camera (and a bigger viewfinder alone won't do it for me) and I
>> wanted a rangefinder, that used M6 is sure tempting.
>> 
>> By the way, I actually prefer the .72 model, and hindsight tells me that I
>> was slightly crazy when I bought the .85 model.
>> 
>> -dan c.
>> 
>> At 11:26 PM 02-10-04 +0200, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>> 
>>>My 0.85 viewfinder on the M6 is the best of them all. That is the only 
>>>Leica rangefinder body I have kept following my digital epiphany. And to 
>>>make it even better, it is one of the "rare" non-TTL versions of the 
>>>M6HM. Not that I care, I have already deflowered it from a collector's 
>>>point of view by using it extensively since buying it a couple of years
ago.
>>>
>>>Nathan
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>
>-- 
>Nathan Wajsman
>Almere, The Netherlands
>
>General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
>Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] Erwin Put's Take on New Rangefinders)
Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)