Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: New Zeiss Ikon
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Mon Oct 4 12:28:39 2004

And I would hardly call the M2 a stripped down entry level M. ;-) The
only real down-market M mount camera Leica produced was the CL, and that
was, as much fun as it was, far too removed from the "real" M family to
serve the purpose of intro-M. 



-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Frank Dernie
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 2:55 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: New Zeiss Ikon


Yes, but they only sold half the quantity of M2s compared to M3s.

On 4 Oct, 2004, at 17:36, <mail@steveunsworth.co.uk> wrote:

>
> Wasn't that the M2 ;-)
>
> Steve
>
> "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> wrote on 04.10.2004, 16:10:26:
>> I was indeed thinking SP, Karen - and everyone else. The S3 was a 
>> stripped down SP - the kind of entry level camera Leica should have 
>> produced.....
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Re: New Zeiss Ikon)
In reply to: Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Re: New Zeiss Ikon)