Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob, You bet it makes a difference. And when I travel with enough room for a Rollei, I pick up the Rolleiflex, put it back down and pack the Rolleicord with me. I have two Rolleicords and one Rolleiflex. The Rolleicords get the most usage. There's no difference in quality and like you say, they weigh less. I can't figure out why they have to weigh so much more. It could be the body, of course, and all the funny mechanisms to show you the shutter and aperature from above. More crude needed for the shutter release. But when you get right down to it, they both have nice lenses. Hey! If you're paying more, you want to feel it! :) Daniel On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 robertmeier@usjet.net wrote: > > Daniel, > > There is an interesting difference in weight between the 'cord and 'flex > models. The Rolleicords weigh in the 33-35 oz. range, while the F models > are in the 43-45 oz. range, depending on whether it has a 3.5 or 2.8 lens. > Now, that's quite a difference in weight. There must be a lot more medal > in an E or F than in a Cord. Do you suppose it's just lead weights? > > Bob > > > > > Ain't nothing wrong with that "cheaper" Rolleiflex-T :) > > > > Better egonomics, they say the Tessar has been improved. It still goes > > "click". > > > > As you say ... everything on a Rollei is reliable and the T is a Rollei. > > Better shutter release design too. > > > > You can't tell the difference in a photograph taken with a Rolleicord, > > Rolleiflex, A-F or T. Rollei quality the whole way. > > > > Daniel > > > > On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 Summicron1@aol.com wrote: > > > >> the latter day rolleiflex cameras that lacked the automat feature were > >> the > >> Rolleiflex-T models -- cheaper versions. > >> > >> the automat feature on mine never goes bad, although i suppose it could, > >> but > >> it's pretty reliable, as is everything on a rollei since they're as well > >> made > >> as leicas. > >> c trentelman > >> In a message dated 10/3/04 7:08:42 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org > >> writes: > >> > >> > >> > > >> > I suppose that feature is nice. But for me, it's just one more thing > >> > that > >> > could go wrong (haven't heard anything about it going wrong though). I > >> > sure wouldn't classify true Rolleiflexes according to them having that > >> > feature or not. A new Rolleiflex made this year or last year? You bet! > >> > It's the: > >> > > >> > 1) Glass > >> > 2) The quiet "click" > >> > > >> > that matters to me. They're beautiful boxes. Love'em. > >> > > >> > Daniel > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >