Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/10/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Jim Marshal's M4 with 35/1.4
From: bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C)
Date: Tue Oct 12 14:39:34 2004
References: <65C26013-1C78-11D9-A593-003065D5F760@earthlink.net> <BD91ABB0.875B%philippe.orlent@pandora.be> <65C26013-1C78-11D9-A593-003065D5F760@earthlink.net>
http://members.lycos.co.uk/JemK/Pic-A-Week/marshall.htm
Maybe the 35 was on the lens because he didn't want to donate his 50? In
any case if the old 35 Summilux was good enough for him, it should be good
enough for me, especially now that I no longer own my aspheric.
-dan c.
Replies:
Reply from locke at straylight.ca (Greg Locke) ([Leica] Jim Marshal's M4 with 35/1.4)
In reply to:
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (feli) ([Leica] Lux Q)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Lux Q)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Lux Q)