Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 10/12/04 8:28 PM, "Terry Cioni" <tcioni@telus.net> wrote: > I start off thanking Tom Abrahamsson for loaning me the RD-1 for 4 days. It > was a great opportunity, unfortunatetly it rained all of the 4 days, but > that > made things more of a challenge and thus more interesting. After all it is > Vancouver. > > For my purposes I shot only .jpg files and did not shoot RAW. I shoot > primarily street scenes around Vancouver and I felt it important the RD-1 > be > able to replace my Lecia rangefinders without any distraction or > complication. > I shot primarily in B&W at 400 ISO in AE mode, adjusting the aperture as > needed. I used a variety of lenses including the TRI-ELMAR (a nice fit for > the > RD-1) and a 21mm F4 VC lens. > > In practical terms the RD-1 exceeded my expectations. It is well built, > has an > amazingly bright viewfinder, not to mention 1:1 viewing. The RD-1 is > intuitive > without being overburdened with buttons, dials, and LCD panels. Indeed once > you figure-out the round dial on top of the camera with it's pointers, it > is > in my very humble opinion better than an LCD status panel found on the > current > crop of digital gear. The battery life seemed good although I would want a > second or third battery in my kit - before I set out on a day of shooting. > The > camera operated flawlessly and I suppose that is all one can ask. I did > notice > there are a number of stuck (on) pixels. Epson might want to consider some > pixel mapping in-camera firmware to ensure this is not a problem for > shooters > going forward. > > I shot the equivalent of 10 rolls of film mostly doing what I like doing > best, > street photography. I did not use the LCD Monitor to check images but > instead > choose to treat the camera no different than a Leica M7, waiting until I > returned home to the digital darkroom to view the images. My assessment is > simple, it is a digital rangefinder that allows me to use my Leica and > Voigtlander lens package - I think it is about time for this camera and > Epson > deserves kudos for doing it. Leica needs to get to moving if they hope to > catch-up with Epson. > > The images appear to be almost grainless (digital noise) from ISO 200 to > 800. > I found myself thinking that I would like to add grain - out of the camera > they are clean, sharp and dynamic range is outstanding. The images did > require > leveling in PhotoShop, but post processing can only be described as > minimal to > achieve excellent results. The ability to use high quality Leica lenses on > the > RD-1 makes it an important addition to any rangefinder film photographers > kit > bag. > > In short I want one, that said I do believe the camera suffers from one > major > problem; price. A digital body no lens, no memory card, six megapixel > sensor > in a Bessa 3A camera body at $2900US is very hard to justify in todays > world > of eight megapixel DSLRs with zoom lens at $1500 to $1800US. > > I have posted some images on my website, > http://www.streetfusion.smugmug.com > The Epson RD-1 photos are indicated above the photo. Thanks for looking. > > Cheers. Terry Cioni > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information A very accurate assessment, Tony. I shoot primarily landscapes and "Americana" work and I've found the color images to be exceptional. I was thinking of posting a link to download the full size JPG files so others can get an idea of the quality of the images. I've had a Nikon D100, which apparently shares the same sensor. Whether it's the glass (almost certainly) or tweaks to the electronics, the R-D1 is certainly superior. I'm taking it to VT this weekend to shoot some leaves. I'll post some images when I return. BTW, great street stuff and a nice site in general. MC