Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/10/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] RD 1 Further Impressions after two weeks of Use
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sat Oct 16 12:46:55 2004
References: <p05111005bd96ef4f1db0@[10.3.82.112]> <8FFA529E-1F49-11D9-A95F-000393778554@netvigator.com> <736D0E52-1F76-11D9-9EB3-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca> <p05111005bd96ef4f1db0@[10.3.82.112]> <3.0.6.32.20041016125743.008fea10@pop.mail.yahoo.ca>
the reactions so far seem favorable...but not not
raving at all, rather guarded....with various
problems noted, among them the rangefinder...Steve
Dan C wrote:
> I am hearing many reports of rangefinder problems with that camera.
>
> -dan c.
>
> At 09:53 AM 16-10-04 -0600, John Collier wrote:
>
>>I am not asking you to buy the RD1 :-) Nor am I going to as I, like
>>you, am happy with my film Ms. I was just pointing out that the RD1
>>seems to have been well received.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to:
Message from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] RD 1 Further Impressions after two weeks of Use)
Message from cummer at netvigator.com (Howard Cummer) ([Leica] RD 1 Further Impressions after two weeks of Use)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] RD 1 Further Impressions after two weeks of Use)
Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] RD 1 Further Impressions after two weeks of Use)