Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> An interesting article about the archivability of digital images from > the NY Times: > > http://tinyurl.com/66otp > I've got to wonder how long the media is going to keep re-cycling this same basic (and somewhat flawed) story? For example: "The life span of data on a CD recorded with a CD burner, for instance, could be as little as five years if it is exposed to extremes in humidity or temperature." Well so is film - if you kept those old colour negs from your wedding in the attic - cold and damp in the winter and rather hot in he summer - they will be toast in pretty short order too. It spends much it's time comparing apples with oranges and then saying they are pears. As for the LoC having to spend time setting standards for preservation of digital material - well whoopi do. Most archives (and especially any government archives) still spending much of their time working and re-working the "workflow" of what is archived and how that gets from the outside world into the archives as the world changes (an archives never archives "everything" - an awful lot of time is spent working out what to chuck out before it ever gets to the archives - and as the world changes, so those decisions change - working out how to do digital is, in many ways, just one more of those processes) etc etc