Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] The Leica CL ! or Bessa R3A ?
From: telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr)
Date: Fri Nov 12 14:31:22 2004
 
Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> wrote:

>> 
>> CL     : 121x76x32 for 510gr with 40/2
>> R3a   :135.5x81x 33.5mm, 430 grams (w/o lens)
>> 

> 80 grams lighter!! (2.8 oz)

The R3a weight is w/o lens.  I bet a 40/2 weighs more than 2.8 oz.


Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] The Leica CL ! or Bessa R3A ?)